ADIR - L'altro diritto

ISSN 1827-0565

Bibliografia

Francesco Manfredi, 2015

  • ABARBANEL S. - McCRAY A. - NEWHALL McCANN K. - SNYDER J., Realigning the Revolving Door: An Analysis of California Counties' AB 109 2011-2012 Implementation Plans, StanfordLawSchool, StanfordCriminalJusticeCenter, 2013.
  • ABRAMS- BEALE: Federal Criminal Law, Second Edition.
  • ADAMS V. C. - THORPE S. W. - TOLLER P. T., The Impact of Proposition 36 on California's Three Strikes Law: An Unwise Initiative, California District Attorneys Association, 2012.
  • ALLEN, Corrections in America, an Introduction, Twelfth Edition, 2009.
  • ALLEN J. R. - FERRAL B. - RATNASWAMY J., The Double Jeopardy Clause, Constitutional Interpretation and the Limits of Formal Logic, Valparaiso University Law Review, vol. 26, n. 1, 1991.
  • AMBROSETTI, Recidiva e recidivismo, 1997, p. 154 ss.
  • AMODIO-BASSIOUNI, Il Processo Penale negli Stati Uniti D'America, Milano, Giuffrè, 1988.
  • AUSTIN-CLARK-HARDYMAN-HENRY Three Strikes and You're Out. The Implementation and Impact of Strike Laws, in NIJ Publications, final report, 2000.
  • BARTOLI R., Lezioni di diritto penale avanzato, Firenze, 2013.
  • Lettura funzionale e costituzionale della recidiva e problemi di razionalità del sistema, estratto, Rivista It. di Dir. e proc. pen., anno LVI Fasc. 4, Milano, Giuffrè, 2013.
  • Il nuovo assetto della tutela a contrasto del fenomeno corruttivo, diritto penale e processo, 2013, pag. 347 e ss.
  • BASSIOUNI, Diritto Penale degli Stati Uniti D'America, Milano, Giuffrè, 1985.
  • BEALE, Still Tough on Crime? Prospects for Restorative Justice in United States Research Paper n. 35, 2002, Duke Law School Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series.
  • The story of Ewing v. California: Three Strikes Laws and the Limits of the Eighth Amendment Proportionality Review, Criminal Law Stories, 2007.
  • BENNET-ROBBINS, Last Words: a Survey and Analysis of Federal Judges' Views on Allocution in Sentencing, by American University Washington College of Law, in The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection, Washington College of Law Research Paper n. 9, 2014, vol. 65, p. 735 ss.
  • BOTTALICO F., Three strikes and you're out: la recidiva nel sistema penale statunitense, in GAROFOLI (a cura di), Problematiche tradizionali e incaute innovazioni legislative, 2006, p. 17 ss.
  • BREYER S., The Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the Key Compromises upon wich they rest, Hofstra Law Review, 1988.
  • BROWN-JOLIVETTE, A Primer: Three Strikers - The Impact After More Than a Decade, 2005, in Legislative Analyst's Office.
  • BUTLER, Much Respect: Toward a Hip-Hop Theory of Punishment, by The George Washington University Law School, in Social Science Research Network, Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper n. 314, 2004, vol. 56, p. 983 ss.
  • CAMERA DEI DEPUTATI, XV LEGISLATURA, LS - LEGISLAZIONE STRANIERA, Rassegna dell'attività legislativa e istituzionale di paesi stranieri, n. 4, Luglio-Agosto 2007.
  • CALDWELL B., Twenty-Five to Life for Adolescent Mistakes: Juvenile Strikes as Cruel and Unusual Punishment, articles in University of San Francisco Law Review, vol. 46, 2012.
  • CAMPBELL A.W., Law Of Sentencing, Second Edition, 1991, Clark Boardam Callaghan (CBC).
  • CANESTRARI-CORNACCHIA-DE SIMONE, Manuale di diritto penale, 2007, Mulino.
  • CARBONE F.A.C., Enhancements in California Criminal Law: Making sense of tacking on more time, Prisoner Rights Attorney, 2011.
  • CARLSMITH, Why Do We Punish? Deterrence and Just Desert as Motives for Punishment, in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002, vol. 83, n.2.
  • CAULKINS P. J., How Large Should the Strike Zone Be in 'Three Strikes and You're Out Sentencing Laws?, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, vol. 17, n.3, 2001.
  • COLQUITT, Can Alabama Handle the Truth (in Sentencing)?, 2009, Alabama Law Review.
  • CONDE MUÑOZ F., ARAN GARCIA M., Derecho Penal, Parte General, 8ª ed., Tirant Lo Blanch Libros, 2010.
  • CONDE MUÑOZ F., Las Reformas de la parte especial del Derecho penal español en el 2003: de la "Tolerancia Cero" al "Derecho penal del enemigo", Revista Eletrônica de Ciências Jurídicas, 2005.
  • CONSEIL COSTITUTIONNEL, parere preventivo in ordine alla costituzionalità della loi renforçant la lutte contre la récidive des majeurs et des mineurs, le 31 juillet 2007, 554 DC, emesso il 9 agosto 2007.
  • CONSEJO GENERAL DEL PODER JUDICIAL, COMISIÓN DE ESTUDIOS E INFORMES, El Informe al Anteproyecto de Ley Orgánica por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 10/1995, de 23 de Noviembre, del Código penal, Madrid, 16 gennaio 2013.
  • CORBETTA, Il nuovo volto della recidiva: "tre colpi e sei fuori"?, in SCALFATI (a cura di), Nuove norme su prescrizione del reato e recidiva. Analisi della legge 5 dicembre 2005, n. 251 ("ex Cirielli"), 2006, p. 53 ss.
  • COUZENS R.J. - BIGELOW A. T., The Amendment of the Three Strikes Sentencing Law, Barrister Press, 2013.
  • D'ANGELO NICOLA, La legge (ex) Cirielli: prescrizione, recidiva, circostanze; commento e comparazione tra vecchia e nuova normative, Maggiori editore, 2006.
  • DE ESCAMILLA ALONSO AVELINA, - ALVAREZ-VALDES GORDILLO IGNACIO, - DELGADO MESTRE ESTEBAN, NUNEZ RODRIGUEZ ALICIA, Derecho Penal Parte Especial, 2008, Colex, 4ª ed.
  • DE FRANCESCO G., Diritto Penale, i Fondamenti, seconda edizione, 2011, Giappichelli, Torino.
  • DE MAILLARD J. & LE GOFF T., La Tolérance Zéro en France, Succès d'un slogan, Illusion d'un transfert, Presses de Sciences Po, Revue française de science politique, 2009/4 - Vol. 59, pages 655 à 679.
  • DELLA BELLA A. P. A., Three strikes and you're out: la guerra al recidivo in California e i suoi echi in Italia Articolo in: Rivista italiana di diritto e procedura penale. 2007, pp. 832-864.
  • DESPORTES F. - LE GUENEC F., Droit Pénal Général, Seizième édition, 2009.
  • DOLCINI, La recidiva riformata. Ancor più selettivo il carcere in Italia, Riv. Ita. di diritto e procedura penale, 2007, p. 513 ss.
  • EASTON-PIPER. Sentencing and punishment: the quest for justice Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 3. Ed.
  • EISENSTAT S., Revenge, Justice and Law: Recognizing the Victim's Desire for Vengeance as a Justification for Punishment, The Wayne Law Review, vol.50, 2005.
  • FANCHIOTTI V., Lineamenti del processo penale statunitense. Corso di lezioni, Torino, Giappichelli, 1987.
  • Il processo penale statunitense: un modello complesso da rivisitare, Giurisprudenza it., 1989, II, 411.
  • FARNSWORTH E. A., Introduzione al sistema giuridico degli Stati Uniti d'America, Milano, Giuffrè, 1979.
  • FEELEY M. M. Le origini e le conseguenze del panico morale: gli effetti sulle Corti americane delle leggi "tre volte e sei eliminato", Riv. Ita. di diritto e procedura penale, 2000, p. 417.
  • FIANDACA G. - MUSCO E., Diritto Penale, Zanichelli, 1989
  • FLANDERS, The Supreme Court and the Rehabilitative Idea, by Saint Louis University School of Law, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, 2014, p. 1-40.
  • FLYNN N. K., Putting Teeth into A.B. 109: Why California's Historic Public Safety Realignment Act Should Require Reentry Programming, Golden Gate University Law Review, vol. 43, art. 7, 2013.
  • FRASE-BERGER, Excessive Prison Sentences, Punishment Goals, and the Eight Amendment: Proportionality Relative to What?, 2004, Minnesota Law review, vol. 89
  • FRONTINI G., La funzione della pena nel dibattito alla Costituente e nello spirito della Costituzione, in Temi Rom., 1989, 34.
  • GAMBINI MUSSO R., Il Plea Bargaining tra Common Law e Civil Law, Milano, Giuffrè, 1985.
  • G. MUSSO, (a cura di) et altr., Il Processo Penale Statunitense, Soggetti ed Atti, Giappichelli, Terza ed., Torino, 2009.
  • GARCÍAÁLVAREZ JAVIER FRANCISCO - GÓMEZ ALLER DOPICO JACOBO E ALTRI, Estudio crítico sobre el anteproyecto de reforma penal de 2012, Ponencias presentadas al Congreso de Profesores de Derecho Penal de 2012 "Estudio crítico sobre el anteproyecto de reforma penal de 2012", celebradas en la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid los días 31 de enero y 1 de febrero de 2013, Tirant lo Blanch ed., Valencia, 2013.
  • GASPARINI, Dall'Indeterminate Sentencing alle Sentencing Guidelines: una riforma rivoluzionaria negli USA, in Indice Penale, 1994.
  • GIUNTA FAUSTO(a cura di), FAUSTO GIUNTA, LUCA BISORI ET ALT., Le innovazioni al sistema penale apportate dalla legge 5 dicembre 2005, n. 251, Giuffrè editore, Milano, 2006.
  • GOODNO H. N., Career Criminals Targeted: The Verdict is in, California's Three Strikes Law Proves Effective, Golden Gate University Law Review, vol. 37, art. 3, 2010.
  • GOMEZ SERRANO ALFONSO, MAILLO SERRANO ALFONSO, Derecho Penal, Parte Especial, 14ª edizione, Dykinson, 2009.
  • GRANDE, E., Il terzo strike. La prigione in America 2007, 168 p., brossura, Editore Sellerio Palermo (collana La nuova diagonale)
  • HARRIS C. J. - JESILOW P., It's not the Old Ball Game: Three Strikes and the Courtroom Workgroup, Justice Quarterly, 2000.
  • HEMMENS C., Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California, Corrections Compendium, ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection, 2002.
  • HEYER F. C., Comparing the Strike Zones of Three Strikes and You're Out Laws for California and Georgia, the Nation's Two Heaviest Hitters, Suffolk University Law Review, vol. XLV, 2012.
  • INGLETTI VITO, Diritto di polizia giudiziaria: diritto penale, procedura penale, diritto di polizia, undicesima edizione, Laurus Robuffo, 2012.
  • JEAN PAUL JEAN, Récidive: évolutions législatives et politique pénale, évaluation, in Conference de Consensus sur la Prevention de la Recidive, 17 janvier 2013.
  • JIMENEZ QUERALT J. J., Derecho Penal Espanol, Parte Especial, Sesta edizione, Atelier Libros Juridicos, 2010.
  • JONES-NEWBURN, Three Strikes and You're Out. Exploring Symbol and Substance in American and British Crime Control Politics, in British Journal of Criminology, 2006, vol. 46 p. 781 ss.
  • KADISH S.H. (a cura di), Encyclopedia of crime and Justice, The Free Press, New York, 1983, p. 1432.
  • KATKIN DANIEL, Habitual Offender Laws: a Riconsideration, Buffalo Law Review.
  • KOLBER J. A., The Subjective Experience of Punishment, Columbia Law Review, vol. 109, 2009.
  • KUMARI, Role of Theories of Punishment in the Policy of Sentencing, 2007.
  • LE CAISNE LÉONORE, La prison, une annexe de la cité? L'expérience collective de détenus mineurs, Ethnologie française, 2009/3 Vol. 39, p. 535-546.
  • LEIPOLD, Recidivism, Incapacitation, and Criminal Sentencing Policy, 2006, University of St. Thomas Law Journal, vol. 3, n. 3.
  • LIVECCHI R., La pena è necessaria, utile ed efficace? Il grande dilemma del diritto penale, in riv. Pen., 1981, 11.
  • LIPPMAN M., Contemporary Criminal Law, Concepts, Cases, and Controversies, 2007.
  • Contemporary Criminal Law, Concepts, Cases, and Controversies, Second Edition, 2010.
  • MALES M. - MACALLAIR D., Striking Out: The Failure of California's "Three Strikes and You're Out" Law, Stanford Law & Policy Review, vol. 11, cap.1, 1999.
  • LOPEZ SARA AGUADO, La Multirreincidencia y la Conversion de Faltas en Delito: Problemas Constitucionales y Alternativas Polìtico-Criminales, Iustel, 2008.
  • MANNOZZI G., Razionalità e giustizia nella commisurazione della pena: il just desert model e la riforma del sentencing nordamericano Padova, CEDAM, 1996, Collana Pubblicazioni della Università di Pavia.
  • Sentencing (voce), in Digesto delle discipline penalistiche, vol. XIII, Torino, Utet, 1991.
  • Fini della pena e commisurazione finalisticamente orientata: un dibattito inesauribile? Ridpp, 1990, 1088
  • MANTOVANI F. Diritto Penale, parte generale, Padova, CEDAM, 2011.
  • MARVELL B. T. - MOODY E. C., The Lethal Effects of Three-Strikes Laws, The Journal of Legal Studies, n. 89, 2001.
  • MASSEY J. H., Disposing of Children: the Eight Amendment and Juvenile Life Without Parole After Roper, in Boston College Law Review, vol. 47, 2006.
  • MEADOW-MENKEL C., Restorative Justice: What is it and Does It Work? In Annu.Rev.Law Soc. Sci., 2007.
  • MILLER FREDERIC P.- VANDOME- McBREWSTER Incarceration in the United States: criminal sentencing in the United States, crime in the United States, law enforcement in the United States, Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Department of Justice / John McBrewster (ed.) Beau Bassin (Mauritius): Alphascript, 2009.
  • MIRAGLIA, Garanzie costituzionali nel processo penale statunitense, Torino, Giappichelli, 2008.
  • MOODY E. C. - MARVELL B. T. - KAMINSKI J. R., Unintended Consequences: Three-Strikes Laws and the Murders of Police Officers, 2002.
  • MUSSO, Il processo penale statunitense, terza ed. Torino, Giappichelli, 2009.
  • NAGEL I.H., Structuring Sentencing Discretion: The New Federal Sentencing Guidelines, Journal of Criminal, Law, and Criminology, 1990.
  • NAGORSKI A., Arguments Against the Use of Recidivist Statutes that contain Mandatory Minimum Sentences, University of Saint Thomas Journal of Law e Public Policy, vol. V, n. 1, 2011.
  • NEPPI MODONA G., Giudice penale americano, (voce) in Digesto delle discipline penalistiche, Torino, Utet, 1991.
  • NUNZIATA, Three strikes and you're out. Pro e contro una recente "misura anticrimine" statunitense: l'ergastolo obbligatorio per i plurirecidivi di gravi crimini, in Riv. Pen., 1997, p. 791 ss.
  • OBSERVATORIO DE LA JUSTICIA Y DE LOS ABOGADOS - ÁREA PROCESAL PENAL, Cuadro Comparativo: Proyecto de Ley Orgánica por la que se modifica la Ley Orgánica 10/1995, de 23 de Noviembre, de Código penal, Ilustre Colegio de Abocados de Madrid, Madrid, 24 febbraio 2014.
  • OLIVARES QUINTERO GONZALO, PRATS MORALES FERMIN, MUNIZ ET ALTRI, Comentarios a la Parte Especial del Derecho Penal, ottava edizione, Aranzadi, 2009.
  • OLIVARES QUINTERO GONZALO, Parte General del Derecho Penal, 3ª edizione, Aranzadi, 2009.
  • PALAZZO F., Corso di diritto penale, parte generale, Quarta Edizione, Torino, Giappichelli, 2011.
  • PALAZZO-PAPA, Lezioni di diritto penale comparato, terza ed., Torino, Giappichelli, 2013.
  • PALIERO, La maschera e il volto, Riv. Ita. di diritto e procedura penale, 2006, p. 500 e 515.
  • PAPA M., Considerazioni sui rapporti tra previsioni legali e prassi applicative nel diritto penale federale statunitense, in Ridpp, 1997.
  • La tutela penale del patrimonio nel diritto anglo-americano, Utet, Torino, 2013.
  • PAVARINI, The spaghetti incapacitation. La nuova disciplina della recidiva, in INSOLERA (a cura di), La legislazione penale compulsiva, 2006, p. 15 ss.
  • PECK C. R., Ewing v. California: Upholding California's Three Strikes Law, Pepperdine Law Review, vol. 32, art. 5, 2004.
  • PHILIPPE ARNAUD, The deterrent effect of an increase in sentence time: evidence from French peines planchers, Abstract, 10 settembre 2013.
  • PILLSBURY, A problem in Emotive Due Process: California's Three Strikes Law, Loyola Law School, Public Law and Legal Theory, 2003.
  • PIZZI, Una tempesta perfetta: la discrezionalità del prosecutor negli Stati Uniti d'America, in Archivio Penale, maggio-agosto 2012, fascicolo 2 anno LXIV p. 553-559.
  • PRADEL J., Enfin des lignes directrices pour sanctionner les delinquants recidivists, in Recueil Dalloz, 2007.
  • RE, L. Carcere e Globalizzazione. Il boom penitenziario negli Stati Uniti e in Europa, Laterza, 2006. Pag. 49-96.
  • REID S. T, Criminal Law, Eighth Edition, Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • REYNOLDS MIKE, 3-Strikes 1994 to 2994 a Decade of Difference, 2004.
  • ROBERT H. -J., Le plancher et le thérapeute, in Dr. Pén., 2007, etude 20.
  • ROBERT PHILIPPE, Peine, récidive et crise sécuritaire, La peine dans tous ses états; FUSL, 16-17 octobre 2009.
  • ROBINSON-GOODWIN-REISIG, The Disutility of Injustice, by New York University Law Review, in Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, from The Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper collection, dicembre 2010, vol. 85, p. 1940 ss.
  • ROBINSON H. P., Crime, Punishment, and Prevention, in The Public Interest, 2001.
  • ROMANO M., Divining The Spirit of California's Three Strikes Law in Federal Sentencing Reporter, vol. 22, n.3, febbraio 2010, p.171-175.
  • RONCO M., Il problema della pena, Torino, Giappichelli, 1996.
  • SALAS DENIS, Etat de Sécurité ou Etat de Droit? L'hésitation française, S.E.R. | Études, 2008/4 - Tome 408, pages 463 à 473.
  • SAVAGE, GROSS, SCHULTZ, CHEMERINSKY, SMITH M. C., FANNAN C., REYNOLDS M., Lockyer v. Andrade, Ewing v. California, College of William e Mary Law School, Supreme Court Preview, 2002.
  • SCALFATI A. (a cura di), BARAZZETTA A., BRICCHETTI R., ET ALTR., Nuove norme su prescrizione del reato e recidiva, analisi della legge 5 dicembre 2005, n. 251 ("ex Cirielli"), CEDAM, 2005.
  • SCHIRALDI- COLBURN- LOTKE, Three Strikes and You're Out: an Examination of the Impact of 3-Strike Laws 10 Years After Their Enactment, A Policy Brief From The Justice Policy Institute, Settembre 2004.
  • SCHMALLEGER FRANK- SMYKLA, Corrections in the 21st Century New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2010 5. ed. XXXII.
  • SHEPERD, Fear Of the First Strike: the Full Deterrent Effect of California's Two and Three-Strikes Legislation, in Journal of Legal Studies, 2002, vol. XXXI p. 165.
  • STARR-REHAVI, Racial Disparity in Federal Criminal Charging and its Sentencing Consequences, Working Paper, University of Michigan Law School, 2012.
  • STANFORD LAW SCHOOL, Progress Report: Three Strikes Reform (Proposition 36), 2013/2014.
  • STITH K. - CABRANES J.A., Fear of Judging. Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts, 1998.
  • STOLZENBERG L. - D'ALESSIO J. S., "Three Strikes and You Are Out": The Impact Of California 's New Mandatory Sentencing Law on Crime Rates, Crime and Delinquency, Ottobre 1997.
  • SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA, In re ADRIAN BEN CERVERA on Habeas Corpus, 2001.
  • THE PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; JESUS ROMERO, Real Party in Interest, 1996.
  • THE PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; STEVEN ALVAREZ, Real Party in Interest, 1997.
  • THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. SEAN HELMS, Defendant and Appellant, 1997.
  • THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GREG ACOSTA, Defendant and Ap-pellant. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID LEWIS CORNELIUS, Defendant and Appellant, 2002.
  • THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DAVID JAMES CASPER, Defendant and Appellant, 2004.
  • THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HAROLD AUSTIN WALLACE, Defendant and Respondent, 2004.
  • SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES, GARY ALBERT EWING, PETITIONER v. CALIFORNIA, 2003.
  • Lockyer, Attorney General Of California v. Andrade, 2003.
  • VARGAS REBOLLO R., Reflexiones y propuestas sobre el tratamiento penal y procesal de la pequeña delincuencia patrimonial, Estudios Penales y Criminológicos, vol. XXXI (2011).
  • VERGES ETIENNE, Peines-plancher et retour des circonstances d'atténuation de la peine: le pouvoir judiciaire d'individualisation de la sanction à l'épreuve de la lutte contre la récidive (loi nº 2007-1198 du 10 août 2007), Revue de science criminelle et de droit pénal comparé, 2007, p. 853.
  • VIGANO' (cenni) La neutralizzazione del delinquente pericoloso nell'ordinamento italiano, in Riv. Ita. dpp, fasc. 4, p.1334-1363, 2012.
  • VITIELLO M., Three strikes: Can We Return to Rationality?, in Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 1997, p. 395 ss.
  • A Proposal for a Wholesale Reform of California's Sentencing Practice and Policy, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, vol. 38, 2004.
  • Reforming Three Strikes' Excesses, Washington University Law Review, vol. 82, n. 1, 2004.
  • Three Strikes and the Romero Case: The Supreme Court Restores Democracy, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, vol. 30, 1997.
  • WALKER, Restorative Justice better than Three Strikes Law, Advertiser, 2007
  • WALKLATE-EVANS, Zero Tolerance or Community Tolerance?: managing crime in high crime areas. Burlington: Ashgate, 1999.
  • ZIMRING F. E. - HAWKINS - KAMIN, Punishment and democracy: three strikes and you're out in California Oxford: Oxford University press, 2001 XI, 244 p.; 24 cm.
  • ZIMRING F. E., Making the Punishment Fit the Crime: A Consumer Guide to Sentencing Reform, Hosting Center Rep., 1976.